Timeline for What to do with answers that fall short of our standards of evidence?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2020 at 6:24 | comment | added | Arnon Weinberg Mod | A newer version of this question: “Flag” and “Recommend Deletion” options for answers that are merely unscientific opinions | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/ with https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 1, 2012 at 16:05 | answer | added | JoshMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 1, 2012 at 12:31 | answer | added | Artem Kaznatcheev | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 16:20 | history | edited | JoshMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 27, 2012 at 21:46 | answer | added | Preece | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 27, 2012 at 0:12 | vote | accept | Jeromy AnglimMod | ||
| Jul 27, 2012 at 0:13 | |||||
| Jul 26, 2012 at 22:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCogSci/status/228621481884676096 | ||
| Jul 26, 2012 at 13:30 | answer | added | Zelda | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 26, 2012 at 13:17 | comment | added | Zelda | @bfrs I completely disagree; wrong answers should be downvoted to at least -3 (where the text fades, giving the impression that it's "wrong" or bad). Pseudoscience answers should be judged as harshly as possible like all pseudoscience. | |
| Jul 26, 2012 at 9:16 | comment | added | bfrs | I agree with you. Comments are the best way to deal with these situations. Also, down voting below 0 is overkill in my view. | |
| Jul 26, 2012 at 1:28 | history | asked | Jeromy AnglimMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |