Questions tagged [feature-request]
You have an idea for a new feature, or for a change to the existing functionality.
30
questions
1
vote
1
answer
17
views
Creation of dissociation tag
I have some questions about dissociation and I am unable to create tags because of my low reputation. Shouldn't we have a dissociation tag?
5
votes
2
answers
89
views
How to reduce self-help questions?
I have the impression that approximately 30-50% of new user questions on this forum are self-help, and readily closed.
Our documentation only mentions self-help questions being off-topic if you read ...
3
votes
0
answers
27
views
Want community promotion ads
Just like BioSe community, CogSci SE community should have community promotion ads. These are created by website users, is relevant to site, is interest-based, is engaging, is knowledgiable, and is ...
3
votes
1
answer
25
views
Rename tag:theory-of-the-mind
The existing tag theory-of-the-mind is a typo in the context it is used; the correct phrase is theory of mind. I suggest the tag be renamed.
2
votes
0
answers
26
views
Should we give (close to the edit box) advice against asking personal diagnosis/treatment questions?
I don't have any stats, but my impression is that about half of the questions asked here by new users are "what's wrong with me?" closely followed by "suggest me a treatment".
We obviously have a ...
2
votes
1
answer
54
views
Should we have a disclaimer?
There is a similar question here from 2012 (Do we want a disclaimer on the sidebar that we cannot offer medical advice?) where it was "accepted" that we don't want a disclaimer on the sidebar, but I ...
5
votes
3
answers
71
views
New title, new phrasing needed for 'not framed in cognitive sciences'
Congratulations everyone on our new flashy site name! Psychology & Neuroscience!
As AliceD pointed out, with the name change come a few other things which need to be changed/rephrased. One of ...
3
votes
0
answers
111
views
Community-answer for questions on Freudian psychology
I think we all agree that Freudian theories don't fit this site's scope. But I also think we all agree that Freudian theories have been, and probably still are, too influential to be put aside as off-...
5
votes
2
answers
60
views
Can we change the example question from our tour?
The example question from our tour is a really bad example of the questions we want on this site.
Could we please replace it with another highly voted question with multiple answers, such as:
Does ...
1
vote
0
answers
30
views
Tag "Religion" can't apply
I was trying to tag a question on the site. This question was about parapsychology. Surprinsingly, there are no tags for that kind of questions.
On the site, a tag "religion" exists, and I guess it's ...
2
votes
2
answers
90
views
Can somebody make a standard response for basic EEG analysis questions
There are tons of really basic EEG analysis questions, whether requests for toolboxes or questions about how to quantify EEG power. If we could assemble all of the answers to these questions into a ...
6
votes
3
answers
89
views
A new CogSci.SE Facebook page
The problem
The focus of improving the website was primarily on "what constituties as a good/bad question". We have deleted many many bad questions and tried to improve others, which is a great ...
10
votes
4
answers
215
views
Proposal: Making CogSci.SE for Researchers
Summary
This site, despite being around for 4 years at this point has yet to graduate from beta due to it's inability to maintain a solid and knowledgeable user base in the form of "expert ...
0
votes
3
answers
73
views
Proposal: Community-Driven Decision Criteria
Many meta posts put forth proposals that get discussed and then abandoned. as reviewed in this question. The StackExchange process assumes that there is a sufficiently large community to drive crowd-...
0
votes
1
answer
22
views
Should mods be able to accept an answer?
I often see that the asker of a question forgets to accept an answer that is really good and has been upvoted several times. I think it would be valuable to have the questions marked as accepted so ...
5
votes
0
answers
70
views
Is it possible to have a giant floating banner that reads: "YOU MUST CITE YOUR CLAIMS [ā¦]"
If you haven't noticed, there's been a small spike in new responders lately, which is great! However, it's not great that the majority of them are not citing any of their claimsā¦many of which are ...
7
votes
3
answers
564
views
Vote for a new site name!
VOTE FOR NEW SITE NAME: PSYCHOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE or MIND AND BRAIN.
PLEASE VOTE HERE. (Ignore the automatic greyout.)
It is a fact that there is essentially no support for Cognitive Sciences as a ...
12
votes
2
answers
287
views
"Flag" and "Recommend Deletion" options for answers that are merely unscientific opinions
The following suggestions address the case where users treat the forum like a social media site (eg, reddit or slashdot), and post "opinion" answers, with no attempt to suggest that they have any ...
9
votes
7
answers
313
views
Proposed Reason for Closure: No Initial Reseach
In chat, we've talked about how unformed, unsourced questions weaken the utility of CogSci.SE, and how requiring some initial research might improve the general level of questions coming from new ...
0
votes
1
answer
56
views
Can we get a share button please?
Can we have a non-intrusive toward load speed and site aesthetics social media share button for questions and answers please?
3
votes
2
answers
82
views
Let's create a Facebook page for cogsci.SE
In reply to other questions about how we can promote the site and thereby solve a score of our current problems,
I suggest we create a Facebook page for CogSci.SE
What for?
The majority of students ...
2
votes
0
answers
46
views
Can we have a badge for popular person?
If there is not already...Could we have a series of badges for popular person? Like having questions or answers with an total large amount of pageviews. I know there is a popular question/answer badge....
3
votes
4
answers
60
views
I request that accepted edits increase the reputation of the editor
It takes time and effort to edit questions to make them comprehensible or on-topic. It's useful work, and it should be rewarded.
0
votes
1
answer
26
views
Split bounties over several answers
Many questions have several great answers: providing different valid viewpoints, or supplementing each other. Often I find it difficult to chose the answer that I want to award the bounty to. Why not ...
3
votes
1
answer
55
views
Do we need private messages?
I guess this has been discussed on other SE sites, but I'm interested in the opinions on cogsci.SE specifically:
I feel this site misses a system to send private messages to other members.
People ...
0
votes
2
answers
109
views
Can we drop Psychiatry?
The field of Psychiatry is the only topic mentioned in the help that is not, itself, a science.
It's like a physics Q&A site where they would include engineering or a biology Q&A site where ...
3
votes
1
answer
27
views
Draft question?
I was writing a new question based on some insight that struck me in the middle some conversation and realized that i just don't have the time at the moment to research all the factors. I had already ...
3
votes
2
answers
48
views
Our site description should be changed to match our new welcome message
We asked for and we received a new welcome message for our site:
This is a collaboratively edited question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, ...
3
votes
2
answers
132
views
Getting MathJax support: Understanding the trade-off between mathjax and page load times
For some time there has been a thread on meta discussing the desire for MathJax support on Cogsci.se in order to support the display of mathematical equations in questions and answers.
Recently I ...
7
votes
6
answers
673
views
When will we get latex mathematics support (i.e., MathJax)?
UPDATE: As of April 26th, we now have MathJax Support on this site.
Hopefully, if this going to be a scientific site, answers will often require presentation of mathematical equations. I think it ...