We’re rewarding the question askers & reputations are being recalculated! Read more.

Questions tagged [faq-contents]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3
votes
2answers
107 views

Are cognitive sciences actually being… scientific?

I came here searching a board to ask psychological (or rather psychiatric) questions. But I mean scientific questions - that's why is something happening based on evidence - not an opinion. I've read ...
6
votes
4answers
90 views

Our FAQ endorses self-help questions

Not all users neglect the FAQ, and those that don't can still be mislead by it since unfortunately we inherit the generic SO template as Knight correctly pointed out in a comment to a question of his ...
6
votes
1answer
41 views

Add “What are Cognitive Sciences?” to the FAQ

The new welcome text is a (groan) welcome addition, but I was thinking maybe a quick blurb in the FAQ could help make it abundantly clear that "cognitive sciences" is not just an alternate spelling of ...
2
votes
0answers
13 views

What process should we adopt to create our FAQ?

A question was recently asked about what should go in our FAQ. At present our FAQ is minimal, and I think we should start to make the FAQ a useful part of our site. But this raises the issue of how ...
3
votes
1answer
47 views

How should our FAQ define us?

Currently the only unique part of our FAQ is as follows: Cognitive Sciences - Stack Exchange is for practitioners and research professionals of the cognitive sciences. The rest is boilerplate that ...
6
votes
3answers
216 views

What is our site NOT about?

Reading the The 7 Essential Meta Questions You'll notice Super User has laid out what items are on topic AND off topic on their site. Database Administrators has also done a superb job outlining ...