-2

I have a question about my Psychology & Neuroscience Stack Exchange post: Is this a possible psychological/scientific reason for women on average not finding chests sexually attractive?

1

The question was closed as opinion-based, and is still opinion-based after edits. What objective evidence can be provided to answer it?

Additional notes:

  • The question conflates sexual attraction with physical attraction.
  • The question is asking if something is a valid reason within science - this is a question about philosophy of science, not psychology.
  • The question is making a statement asking for validation, rather than asking a question - ie, "Here is my answer" rather than "What is the answer?"
  • Questions about "why" need to be clear on what level of interpretation is expected. Since sexual characteristics are of evolutionary origin, it is not clear to me that this question belongs in psychology.SE, rather than biology.SE, though as-asked, it would be closed on any science stack.

A few questions you may want to review instead:

2
  • you see, that question (Why are (some) male humans . . .) is not closed. How my question was different than that? I am asking same in my other question about men's attraction for breasts. I even included lot of details also. So it feels like baised response to me.
    – vivek
    Mar 11 at 5:14
  • It feels a bit absurd to me when you're giving me reference of a question which is also opinion based and much under researched than mine and yet not closed.
    – vivek
    Mar 12 at 5:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .