Steven and I were recently flumoxed by the question "Different disciplines of psychology". It's different than other prior questions that can be reduced to "How do I learn about psychology/neuroscience given background x". It asks how high school students can determine which field/domain/discipline they can focus on. I feel like this is different, but I can't specify why?

Is it because the population it refers to is more general/numerous? Is it because it refers to starting points of exploration as opposed to a specifically defined path? How should we decide what resource requests are on-topic here?


We discussed something similar in "Can you ask questions that involve lists where you want to learn the items on the list but also what is best?"

In my answer there, I quote an early blog post by Jeff Atwood on the topic of what can make a subjective question a good (constructive) question: Real Questions Have Answers

Constructive subjective questions:

  1. inspire answers that explain “why” and “how”.
  2. tend to have long, not short, answers.
  3. have a constructive, fair, and impartial tone.
  4. invite sharing experiences over opinions.
  5. insist that opinion be backed up with facts and references.
  6. are more than just mindless social fun.

At a glace, I also considered the question you link to to be 'primarily opinion-based'. However, the OP did a great job at defining it narrowly enough so that it wouldn't elicit an infinite list of responses and asks explicitly for resources which could help his son himself making up his mind. He is not asking for answers to tell the OP what to choice (quite meta, but good meta).

As your answer on Quora indicates, you can answer this in a fairly non-subjective way which lives up to the criteria listed above.

My vote is to keep it (and 'subjective' questions with similar characteristics) open.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .