I really like the ideas behind Robin's answer to this question, but I feel like it could use a bit of polish. Since it's kind of unwieldy to continue discussing that post in the comments, I've created a new question.
Given the goals of a Close Vote reason:
- Can the title of the reason be improved? The current proposed title is "Below quality standards".
- Can the body of the reason be improved? The current body is:
This question does not meet the quality standards, and it is unlikely to receive a satisfying answer. The question shows no attempt of initial research and/or shows no relevance to CogSci.SE. Let the readers know at what level you expect an answer, and show them why they would want to answer it? The more context you provide, the better we'll be able to answer your question.
- What should the FAQ linked to the reason contain? A good close reason should link to an FAQ if it's not covered adequately in "How to Ask".